If ever there was an article that could show the average American that they shouldn't view Orwellian literature as "tinfoil hatish", this would be it...
Update: Dept. of Homeland Security weighs forcing passengers to wear stun gun bracelets on airplanes
Back in March, Gadling blogged about a firearm training system, Lamperd, which had patented a bracelet that worked like a stun gun when activated.
At the time, Lamperd was lobbying the Transportation Security Administration to make it mandatory for all airline passengers to wear one, with the thinking that it was the best way to thwart a terrorist.
Well, here's an update.
The Department of Homeland Security, ever the shepherds watching over their flocks, appears to be seriously weighing making this bracelet mandatory and has sent a letter to Lamperd encouraging the company to draft a formal proposal for integrating its bracelet into flight security.
That's right. Your tax dollars are funding the R&D arm of DHS, which wants to develop technology that acts essentially as a GPS attached to your wrist, allowing the government to track pretty much everywhere you go once you check in for your flight, and giving the flight crew the ability to waylay you if you get out of hand.
O.K., that might be overstating it: Officials say the bracelet would only be activated in the event of a terrorist attack. But still....
Here is a promotional video for the bracelet that piqued DHS's interest.
The Washington Times today quotes a letter from DHS's Paul S. Ruwaldt, of the Science and Technology Directorate, in which he writes to Lamperd saying, "To make it clear, we are interested in...the immobilizing security bracelet and look forward to receiving a written proposal."
The Times says the letter was written on Federal Aviation Administration letterhead.
The Times goes on to detail what the bracelet could do. It would:
At the time, Lamperd was lobbying the Transportation Security Administration to make it mandatory for all airline passengers to wear one, with the thinking that it was the best way to thwart a terrorist.
Well, here's an update.
The Department of Homeland Security, ever the shepherds watching over their flocks, appears to be seriously weighing making this bracelet mandatory and has sent a letter to Lamperd encouraging the company to draft a formal proposal for integrating its bracelet into flight security.
That's right. Your tax dollars are funding the R&D arm of DHS, which wants to develop technology that acts essentially as a GPS attached to your wrist, allowing the government to track pretty much everywhere you go once you check in for your flight, and giving the flight crew the ability to waylay you if you get out of hand.
O.K., that might be overstating it: Officials say the bracelet would only be activated in the event of a terrorist attack. But still....
Here is a promotional video for the bracelet that piqued DHS's interest.
The Washington Times today quotes a letter from DHS's Paul S. Ruwaldt, of the Science and Technology Directorate, in which he writes to Lamperd saying, "To make it clear, we are interested in...the immobilizing security bracelet and look forward to receiving a written proposal."
The Times says the letter was written on Federal Aviation Administration letterhead.
The Times goes on to detail what the bracelet could do. It would:
- Eliminate the need to carry a boarding pass
- Contain personal data about you, including your travel history
- Monitor the whereabouts of both you and your luggage after check-in
- Employ Electro-Musclar Disruption technology that could immobilize a passenger for nearly 10 minutes
Now, with all the idiotic things passengers have been doing on planes of late, I could maybe get behind employing some kind of bracelet stun gun.
But seriously, I consider all this with some foreboding. I mean, slipping a bracelet on a little kid that could deliver a shock powerful enough to make an electronic dog fence zap seem like a pinprick is a scary thought. What if a flight attendant accidently activates one of them?
What do you think? Would mandatory bracelets like these make air travel safer, or is this just another way for the government to look over our shoulders?
Holy Crap... Is this really the kind of people who are ruining, I mean running our nation? Are they really considering treating us like animals? If this happens, I am really considering learning the Canadian National anthem and moving north...
But seriously, I consider all this with some foreboding. I mean, slipping a bracelet on a little kid that could deliver a shock powerful enough to make an electronic dog fence zap seem like a pinprick is a scary thought. What if a flight attendant accidently activates one of them?
What do you think? Would mandatory bracelets like these make air travel safer, or is this just another way for the government to look over our shoulders?
Holy Crap... Is this really the kind of people who are ruining, I mean running our nation? Are they really considering treating us like animals? If this happens, I am really considering learning the Canadian National anthem and moving north...
5 comments:
Shock Collars for All Americans!
No kidding?
I just thought of something though-- They'd have to zap everybody on board within range. There's no way this would be effective to one person at a time.
I smell pending lawsuits from bystanders with cardiac problems...
Are you sure this isn't a hoax?
Well I hope to God it is a hoax, because that would be insane if they really tried to do something like this...
Besides, I found this story on AOL's news page while I was checking my email, so I imagine that would make it at least somewhat reputable...
I doubt that the brilliant software/hardware engineering we have in this country will be able to ensure that the thing will: 1) Be secure enough so that malicious parties cannot activate the shock-capability of it, and 2) That it will never ever accidentally go off for any reason
Give me a break, the engineering in this country cannot make a lot of things that work 100% reliably. When we do, it costs about 10+ times more just for that guarantee to get over the 99% reliability hump (such is why NASA has such a huge budget). We don't even spend that kind of money to protect our soldiers.
Post a Comment